Remainder, Repetition
(残り・復習)
Discrete Mathematics I
15th lecture, Jan. 22, 2015
http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp/2015/Math1/lecture15.html
Martin J. Dürst
© 2006-15 Martin
J. Dürst Aoyama Gakuin
University
Today's Schedule
- Remaining Schedule
- Summary and homework for last lecture
- Mathematical Induction (continued)
- Repetition
- Lookout
Remaining Schedule
January 29 (Friday), 11:10~12:35: Final exam
Summary of Last Lecture
- Proofs are the most important tool of Mathematics,
and very useful for Information Technology
- There are many different proof methods:
Deductive proof, inductive proof, proof by contradiction, proof by
counterexample, proof about sets, proof by enumeration
- Mathematical induction is an important proof method
Correction: Proof by Contradiction
The logical expression for proof by contradiction in last lecture's handout
is correct:
(¬S→S) ⇒ S
Confirmation:
S |
¬S |
¬S→S |
(¬S→S) → S |
F |
T |
F |
T |
T |
F |
T |
T |
Proving Commutativity of Addition
from Peano Axioms
In lecture 2, we proved associativity of addition (a +
(b+c) = (a+b) + c) from
the Peano Axioms.
This was a (very informal) proof by mathematical induction.
Here we prove commutativity of addition (a+b =
b+a), also by mathematical induction.
Reminder: axioms of addition
(expressed with predicate logic)
- ∀a∈ℕ+: a + 1 = s(a)
- ∀a, b∈ℕ+: a +
s(b) = s(a + b)
Induction for Peano arithmetic (Peano axiom 5):
P(1) ∧ (∀k∈ℕ+:
P(k) → P(s(k)) ⇒
∀n∈ℕ+: P(n)
Lemma: Commutativity of Addition for 1
Lemma: 1+a = s(a) = a+1
(a lemma is a minor theorem, used as a stepping stone)
Proof:
- Base case (a=1):
1+1 [axiom of addition 1]
= s(1) [axiom of addition 1]
= 1+1
- Inductive step: Proof of 1+s(k) = s(s(k)) =
s(k)+1
- Inductive assumption: 1+k = s(k) =
k+1
- 1 + s(k) [axiom of addition 1]
= 1 + (k+1) [associativity of
addition]
= (1+k) + 1 [hypothesis]
= s(k) + 1 [axiom of addition 1]
= s(s(k)) Q.E.D.
Proof of Main Theorem
Theorem: a+b = b+a
Method: Use induction over b.
[General remark: if there are two or more variables, try induction over one
of them.]
- Base case (b=1):
a+1 = 1+a from Lemma on previous slide
- Inductive step: Proof of a+s(k) =
s(k)+a
- Inductive assumption: a+k =
k+a
- a + s(k) [axiom of addition 1]
= a + (k+1) [associativity of addition]
= (a+k) + 1 [hypothesis]
= (k+a) + 1 [associativity of addition]
= k + (a+1) [lemma on previous slide]
= k + (1+a) [associativity of addition]
= (k+1) + a [axiom of addition 1]
= s(k) + a Q.E.D.
Comment: The commutative law is simpler than the associative law. However,
proving the commutative law was more difficult. Actually, we used the
associative law (four times) to prove the commutative law.
Fibonacci Numbers
Number sequence: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55,...
Definition of Fibonacci function fib(n):
- fib(0) = 0
- fib(1) = 1
- ∀n>1: fib(n) =
fib(n-1) + fib(n-2)
Wide range of applications:
- Number of rabbits after n months
- Golden ratio
- Number of sunflower seeds
Wide range of mathematical properties
Property: fib(n+m) =
fib(m) · fib(n+1) +
fib(m-1) · fib(n)
(∀n≥0, m≥1)
Proof by induction over n:
- Base case (n=0):
fib(0+m) = fib(m) ·
fib(0+1) + fib(m-1) ·
fib(0)
fib(m) = fib(m) · 1 +
fib(m-1) · 0
- Inductive step: Proof of fib(k+1+m) =
fib(m) · fib(k+2) +
fib(m-1) · fib(k+1)
- Inductive assumption:
fib(k+p) =
fib(p) · fib(k+1) +
fib(p-1) · fib(k)
(∀p≥1)
- (Hint: Start with more difficult side)
fib(m) · fib(k+2) +
fib(m-1) · fib(k+1)
[Definition of fib (k>0)]
= fib(m) ·
(fib(k+1)+fib(k)) +
fib(m-1) · fib(k+1)
[arithmetic]
= (fib(m)+ fib(m-1)) ·
fib(k+1) + fib(m) ·
fib(k) [Definition of fib
(m>1)]
= fib(m+1) · fib(k+1) +
fib(m) · fib(k)
[hypothesis, p = m+1]
= fib(k+m+1) [arithmetic]
= fib(k+1+m) Q.E.D.
Example of Structural Induction
- Theorem to be proved:
In a binary tree with l leaves, the number of nodes is
n = 2l-1
- Definition of binary tree:
Directed graph with the following conditions:
- No cycles
- If there is a directed edge (arrow) from node a to node
b, then a is the parent of b,
and b is the child of a
- All nodes except the root have a parent
- There are two types of nodes:
- Leaves, which have no children
- Internal nodes, which have exactly two children
Proof of the Relation between the Number of Nodes and Leaves in a Binary
Tree
We start with a very small tree consisting only of the root, and grow it
step by step. We can create any shape of binary tree this way.
- Base case: In a tree with only the root node, n=1 and
l=1, therefore n = 2l-1 is correct.
- Inductive step: Grow the tree one step by replacing a leaf with an
internal node with two leaves.
Denote the number of nodes before growing by n, the number of
leaves before growing by l, the number of nodes after growth by
n', and the number of leaves after growth by l'. We
need to prove n' = 2l'-1.
- Inductive assumption: n = 2l-1
- In one growth step, the number of nodes increases by two:
n'=n+2 (1)
In one growth step, the number of leaves increases by two but is
reduced by one: l'=l+2-1=l+1;
l = l'-1 (2)
n' [(1)]
= n+2 [hypothesis]
= 2l-1+2 [(2)]
= 2(l'-1)-1+2 [arithmetic]
= 2l'-1 Q.E.D.
Outlook
情報数学 II: 情報理論、グラフ理論など
(二年前期、大原先生)
計算機実習 I (二年前期, Dürst)
データ構造とアルゴリズム (二年後期, Dürst)
言語理論とコンパイラ (三年前期, Dürst)
卒業研究 (四年通年)
Repetition
Homework 3 from last lecture: Find a question regarding past examinations
that you can ask in the next lecture.
Glossary
- commutativity
- 可換性 (注: 交換性ではない)
- associativity
- 結合性
- (in)formal
- (非)形式的
- lemma
- 補題 (補助定理)
- golden ratio
- 黄金比
- structural induction
- 構造的帰納法
- binary tree
- 二分木
- node (of a tree/graph)
- 節
- leaf (of a tree)
- 葉
- directed graph
- 有効グラフ
- cycle (of a graph)
- 閉路
- parent (in a tree)
- 親
- child (in a tree)
- 子
- root (of a tree)
- 根
- internal node
- 内部節